By KM
Published Jun 19
8 cards
Grid View
/
This is a published deck. Feel free look around, review cards, or make changes, but you'll need to save it to save your progress.
9.8.0 What would be an example of optimistic culture in our history?
3 hidden sides
New
9.7.0 What is the principle of optimism?
---> The Principle of Optimism All evils are caused by insufficient knowledge. — page 212
---> The Principle of Optimism All evils are caused by insufficient knowledge. — page 212
If something doesn’t go against the laws of physics then it can be done. If laws of physics don’t prohibit a problem to be solved, it will be solved, it is just a matter of knowing how.
Optimism is, in the first instance, a way of explaining failure, not prophesying success. It says that there is no fundamental barrier, no law of nature or supernatural decree, preventing progress. Whenever we try to improve things and fail, it is not because the spiteful (or unfathomably benevolent) gods are thwarting us or punishing us for trying, or because we have reached a limit on the capacity of reason to make improvements, or because it is best that we fail, but always because we did not know enough, in time. But optimism is also a stance towards the future, because nearly all failures, and nearly all successes, are yet to come.Optimism follows from the explicability of the physical world, as I explained in Chapter 3. If something is permitted by the laws of physics, then the only thing that can prevent it from being technologically possible is not knowing how. Optimism also assumes that none of the prohibitions imposed by the laws of physics are necessarily evils. So, for instance, the lack of the impossible knowledge of prophecy is not an insuperable obstacle to progress. Nor are insoluble mathematical problems, as I explained in Chapter 8.That means that in the long run there are no insuperable evils, and in the short run the only insuperable evils are parochial ones. There can be no such thing as a disease for which it is impossible to discover a cure, other than certain types of brain damage – those that have dissipated the knowledge that constitutes the patient’s personality. For a sick person is a physical object, and the task of transforming this object into the same person in good health is one that no law of physics rules out. Hence there is a way of achieving such a transformation – that is to say, a cure. It is only a matter of knowing how. If we do not, for the moment, know how to eliminate a particular evil, or we know in theory but do not yet have enough time or resources (i.e. wealth), then, even so, it is universally true that either the laws of physics forbid eliminating it in a given time with the available resources or there is a way of eliminating it in the time and with those resources. — page 212
2 hidden sides
New
9.6.0 What is David’s definition of wealth?
1 hidden side
New
9.5.0 How Popperian epistemology applies to political philosophy?
3 hidden sides
New
9.4.0 We have seen that both blind pessimism and optimism are unfavorable. We also can’t predict the future because of knowledge creation unpredictability. The question arises: How then can we formulate policies for the unknown? What should we derive them from?
1 hidden side
New
9.3.0 What is the precautionary principle according to David?
9 hidden sides
New
9.2.0 What is the distinction David draws between prediction and prophecy?
5 hidden sides
New
9.1.0 What are Martin Rees’s views on humanity’s chances to survive twenty-first century?
3 hidden sides
New